It’s hard to tell which “science” is more often wrong: economic forecasting or climate forecasting. Predict, 165,000 – get 304,000. Epic fail.
Every month economists make forecasts about all sorts of things. They use complex computer models filled with invented algorithms into which they feed observations of market movements and any other data they can lay their hands on. At the end the spit out predictions. Which are, pretty regularly, epic fails. Just because the outcome is better than expectation, missing with a prediction by 100% makes that original prediction completely useless and anyone who took action based on that prediction looks like a fool.
The claims made by computer modelling climate “scientists” are usually set much further into the future. So when they fail so epically, the “scientists” have usually spent the intervening years massaging their models to hide how much of an epic fail their entire branch of “science” has been.
The only thing worse than either climate forecasting or economic forecasting, is making economic policies based on climate forecasts.
The future is bleak according to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unless we do stuff. Stuff she doesn’t understand. Based on computer models she doesn’t understand. But she’s absolutely sure she knows which people do understand and she’s adamant we must follow their advice blindly. Because science.
Here’s why modeling the climate in a computer is dumb. Making economic and social decisions based on those prediction is dumber. Unfortunately Modians like AOC always use modian solutions to solve mundian problems.
I spent 9 years learning Physics at degree level and above, achieving a PhD in computer modeling.