Podcast explains the Global Warming Climate Change Catastrophe Hoax

This is it…. how to talk about the Climate Catastrophe hoax without dismissing it all but without needing to go into the complete details of every scientific climate theory ever invented, tested, proved, disproved and replaced with something better.

I’m talking about how simulations work, what the atmosphere is composed of, what 400 parts per million actually means and why we say that instead of 0.04% even though its the same.

I also make reference to studies of local ground level pollution in Israel during Yom Kippur and how this drops very fast when we stop driving and running industry. That’s one of the reasons I’m optimistic that we can fix whatever man has done and we can live with any changes.

Man is hugely resilient and the planet is too. Together we’ll solve problems only as long as we don’t install political systems and governance that destroy human ingenuity. Installing globalised communistic or socialist systems seems to be what underlies all of those pushing the climate crisis hoax and their Green New Deal and other delusional focusing on CO₂ as the only thing that matters.

In the end I’m optimistic that man can solve all problems of changing climate whether we made it change or not. But not through communism, socialism or globalism and central control.

My previous important discussions on Climate Change:

Science!

Economic forecasting or climate forecasting: which is worse?

It’s hard to tell which “science” is more often wrong: economic forecasting or climate forecasting. Predict, 165,000 – get 304,000. Epic fail.

Every month economists make forecasts about all sorts of things. They use complex computer models filled with invented algorithms into which they feed observations of market movements and any other data they can lay their hands on. At the end the spit out predictions. Which are, pretty regularly, epic fails. Just because the outcome is better than expectation, missing with a prediction by 100% makes that original prediction completely useless and anyone who took action based on that prediction looks like a fool.

The claims made by computer modelling climate “scientists” are usually set much further into the future. So when they fail so epically, the “scientists” have usually spent the intervening years massaging their models to hide how much of an epic fail their entire branch of “science” has been.

The only thing worse than either climate forecasting or economic forecasting, is making economic policies based on climate forecasts.

https://twitter.com/brianoflondon/status/1091825826562232320

If you derive value from my work, please consider donating some value my way. You can find all the details on the donation page.

The World Will End

The future is bleak according to Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez unless we do stuff. Stuff she doesn’t understand. Based on computer models she doesn’t understand. But she’s absolutely sure she knows which people do understand and she’s adamant we must follow their advice blindly. Because science.

Here’s why modeling the climate in a computer is dumb. Making economic and social decisions based on those prediction is dumber. Unfortunately Modians like AOC always use modian solutions to solve mundian problems.

I spent 9 years learning Physics at degree level and above, achieving a PhD in computer modeling.

If you derive value from my work, please consider donating some value my way. You can find all the details on the donation page.