Carl Benjamin held an interview with a journalist whose name escapes me. In the interview Carl was asked what he thought about the age of consent regarding the revelation by Milo that he had been molested at age 12 and found he quite liked the experience.

Carl quite correctly said that the law was in place for a reason. That some young people developed emotionally much quicker than others. That girls were often ahead of boys but the law has to protect the vulnerable and the slower developer. He actually said he would raise the age of consent to 18 years old because too many young people were not mature enough in our modern world to understand the consequences of intimate relationships. However, the law decided on 16yrs old as a fairly accurate assumption of emotional maturity. But if 12 year olds felt comfortable with grown up relationships it could be their had matured earlier, or indeed, that they didn’t know how to deal with such relationships being forced on them so their brain processed the information as acceptable

It was a very long interview and the discussion on Milo was actually very short. The media have taken everything out of context as they always do when they start their dirty smear campaigns.

If you watch his interview (the full one) with sky news they discuss it. Vee has also done a video explaining how this is simply the latest smear attempt. Anyone who thinks that he has actually endorsed child rape has not actually watched the video in which this discussion takes place and has simply accepted what is basically a lie that has been spread by some media outlets.

see Sargon’s post… Well seems to have been disappeared 1 minute after I posted this link
https://www.facebook.com/sargonofakkad100/posts/2689799364369029?__xts__%5B0%5D=68.ARDX8uTd3YdgFjsQ9WI5lP6cCk04LZ_msuR0wdYexb2Y7tg81ebf166nZ5e5QPIjzatwvoqaav59e6AISlLpTxA_YWzWVQ1deYwKkrSYObd9rU8r0S-ZckSCq7twM24g3zgV_VJ0vcXnr7inKcYXM1RtcW51jeAmndHBEmQqZdHLPKgEDfcmu4uY60LhUZ0JqWBO9iTXDnfEQ65iD5Wqg_o194eMCBivIe8qHaPUZAW6qGuAYCrc_SoiHOlVplvNEndJnMkSTXF6_hVYIX30ncBhw0v_4j4YAUaADbiadxcd8mf0xYrNNLxAUnQwHpjJW0s7oLeu82cwlotPpaHuPPzhZOQrn29KT-7tzNuAmQBfP0mySaGYxABJIYzwnmyQQwxtuuNp2BrcMSArfCcqUtRMUOq-h_c0ZcEbqqdb2Aawgxv6ugvemLPEqmnYiHOuryQp5zqzEmkj_pKZ90YDWJNh4ijX5wBwLELq0ySMPqrnuTEtlIp6J2hMBg&__tn__=-R

It’s something Luke Nash Jones brought up. Now LNJ is a truly vile person with no integrity, but he did provide the evidence. Sky has also alluded to it, so I’m guessing they’re saving it up to throw at him at a strategic moment.

Id love to see a link to his questionable view, ive only ever seen him condemn such things. Perhaps you are spreading fake news without knowing it.

Honk!

What iffy view is that? From what I’ve heard him say he supports keeping the law as is (16 in the UK) but acknowledges that that will be too young for some and too old for others Seemed pretty reasonable to me

It’s a question of choice though. Compared to the rest of the dhimmified quisling field of candidates he’s up against, who are part of that political class that didn’t care about underaged girls getting raped on an industrial scale by Muslim grooming gangs as long as they didn’t get called ‘Islamophobe’ or ‘racist’, will it be a bad thing if he gets elected?